Categories: India News

‘The Case Was Politically Driven…..’ Senior Advocate Mahesh Jethmalani On 2008 Malegaon Bomb Blast Verdict

Reacting to the 2008 Malegaon Blast verdict, senior advocate Mahesh Jethmalani said, “I feel sorry for the victims who suffered as the case was politically driven."

Add NewsX As A Trusted Source
Add as a preferred
source on Google
Published by Sarthak Arora
Published: July 31, 2025 17:43:41 IST

A special National Investigation Agency court acquitted all seven accused in the 2008 Malegaon Bomb Blast Case . The acquitted include the former BJP MP Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur , Lieutenant Colonel Prasad Shrikant Purohit, Major (retired) Ramesh Upadhyay, Ajay Rahirkar, Sudhakar Dwivedi, Sudhakar Chaturvedi and Sameer Kulkarni. According to the News 18, senior advocate Mahesh Jethmalani, who had previously represented the former BJP MP Sadhvi Pragya, reacted to this verdict. Mr Mahesh said that this was a false case. The senior advocate further said the issue was “politicised” and was only to further a statement by a leading politician Hindu terrorism was more dangerous than LET Terrorism.” The senior advocate added, “I feel sorry for the victims who suffered as the case was politically driven.”

What was the 2008 Malegaon blast case?

Six people died and nearly 100 were injured on September 30, 2008, six when an explosive device strapped on a motorcycle detonated near a mosque in Malegaon. Malegaon is a town in north Maharashtra. An FIR was lodged at Azad Nagar Police station in Malegaon. On October 21, 2008, Maharashtra’s Anti-Terrorism Squad takes over the probe into the case.

What did the court said on the compensation for 2008 Malegaon Blast Case victims?

According to the court, the families of all six victims of the blast will be given Rs 2 lakh each. A compensation of Rs 50,000 will be given to the injured victims.

What did the court said while acquitting the accused in 2008 Malegaon Blast Case?

Quoting the court’s verdict, ANI reported that the terrorism has no religion because no religion can advocate violence. According to the court, it cannot convict anyone merely on perception and moral evidence; there has to be cogent evidence. The court further added that there is no proof of bomb being planted on bike and no evidence of storing or assembling the explosives in Shrikant Prasad Purohit’s residence. The court stated that the motorbike’s chassis number was wiped out and engine number is in doubt.

Also read: Lieutenant Colonel Prasad Shrikant Purohit After Acquittal In The 2008 Malegaon Blast Case: ‘I Am A Soldier Who Loves This Country Immensely….’,

Published by Sarthak Arora
Published: July 31, 2025 17:43:41 IST

Recent Posts

Eid-ul-Fitr 2026 In India: Festival On March 21 As Shawwal Moon Not Sighted, Ramadan Extended To 30 Days

Eid-ul-Fitr will be celebrated across India on March 21 after the Shawwal moon was not…

March 19, 2026

US-Israel Divide Deepens As Trump Eyes Quick End to Iran War, Netanyahu Pushes Broader Agenda, Claims New Report

Rising tensions between Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu signal a potential rift as US and…

March 19, 2026

IPL 2026: Big Blow For Rajasthan Royals as ₹2.4 Crore All-Rounder Suffers Groin Injury, Doubtful for Season | Details Inside

Huge blow for Rajasthan Royals! England all-rounder Sam Curran is set to miss IPL 2026…

March 19, 2026