Categories: BusinessWorld

Mass Layoffs Loom As Supreme Court Backs Trump’s Plan For Federal Workforce Downsizing

The US Supreme Court on Tuesday sided with Donald Trump's mass layoffs but declined to rule on whether particular firing schemes were legal, holding up the matter for future consideration. The ruling supports continued cuts but keeps the door open for possible legal challenges in the future.

Add NewsX As A Trusted Source
Add as a preferred
source on Google
Published by Varsha Rai
Published: July 9, 2025 15:54:59 IST

The Supreme Court reversed a lower court’s decision in Tuesday’s ruling, clearing the way for Trump’s executive order directing government agencies to lay off hundreds of thousands of federal employees.

The judges said, “We express no view on the legality of any.” Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor also agreed with the court’s ruling, but noted that the question might return to the Supreme Court, NPR reported.

Donald Trump Attempts To Overturn Federal Bureaucracy

Those proposed layoffs, some of which were put forward earlier this year, may still be subject to legal challenges on various grounds, including union resistance, statutory barriers, and civil service protections.

In response to other Trump administration’s emergency requests, the Supreme Court has repeatedly stood with President Donald Trump in his attempts to overturn the federal bureaucracy. The court’s conservative majority has allowed the administration to remove independent regulators and thousands of probationary employees while legal battles continue in the lower courts.

Donald Trump’s Push To Centralize Bureaucracy

The ruling is the latest victory for Trump’s overall push to centralize power in the executive branch. The Supreme Court has ruled in Trump’s favor on a number of cases on an emergency basis since his return to office in January, including paving the way for the enforcement of some of his tough immigration policies.

The Supreme Court ruling on Tuesday overturned San Francisco-based U.S. District Judge Susan Illston’s May order temporarily enjoining massive federal firings while the case moved forward. 

“As history shows, the president can restructure federal agencies broadly only when Congress so authorizes,” Illston stated. Illston had determined that Trump overstepped his authority by issuing orders for the government to downsize without seeking approval from Congress, which had created and funded the targeted agencies.

The plaintiffs had threatened in court documents that Trump’s proposals, if permitted to go forward, would lead to the laying off of hundreds of thousands of workers.

Published by Varsha Rai
Published: July 9, 2025 15:54:59 IST

Recent Posts

Why Elon Musk’s X Has Been Slapped With $140 Million Fine in Europe? All You Need To Know

The European Union has fined the Elon Musk's social media company X with $140 million…

December 5, 2025

What’s On Putin’s Plate? Internet Gets Curious What Did Russian President Eat As Presidential Dinner Is Hosted For Him At Rashtrapati Bhavan

Vladimir Putin sat beside PM Modi as President Droupadi Murmu hosted a state banquet at…

December 5, 2025

Does Shashi Tharoor’s Presence At The Putin Dinner Signal A Shift In Political Equations? Everything Decoded

The state dinner invitation to Shashi Tharoor with Putin, while Rahul Gandhi and Mallikarjun Kharge…

December 5, 2025