Categories: India

SC: Journalists’ Articles or Videos Are Not Prima Facie Sedition, Warns of Misuse of Good Laws

The Supreme Court ruled that journalists’ articles or videos aren’t prima facie sedition under BNS Section 152, stressing that good laws can be misused. Granting protection to The Wire’s editors, it emphasized proof of tangible harm before criminal prosecution.

Add NewsX As A Trusted Source
Add as a preferred
source on Google
Published by Spandan Dubey
Published: August 13, 2025 19:19:33 IST

The Supreme Court of India delivered a significant ruling today, claiming that journalistic expression such as news articles and videos does not, on its own, constitute a prima facie offense under Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), the new provision that replaces the colonial-era sedition law in the Indian Penal Code. The bench underscored that while a well-intended law can be misused, judicial safeguards must prevent arbitrary application. 

The case before the court involved Siddharth Varadarajan, editor of The Wire, and associates, who faced legal action from Assam police over a reporting piece on alleged Indian Air Force fighter jet losses during “Operation Sindoor.” The court granted them protection from arrest. Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi questioned whether routine journalistic work should draw criminal consequences, emphasizing that writing an article cannot equate to acts such as arms smuggling. 

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta argued that the plea was an attempt to avoid accountability. Yet the court maintained a clear distinction between reporting and criminality. Justice Kant clarified that journalists are not granted special privileges, but that expression via media cannot be considered criminal absent proof of a threat to national unity. Justice Bagchi highlighted that the potential for misuse alone is not a valid basis for declaring a law unconstitutional; such judgments must rest on legislative intent and validity.

This ruling follows the Supreme Court’s issuance earlier this week of a notice to the central government on a separate petition challenging Section 152’s constitutional validity, on grounds that it may replicate the vaguely worded and historically misused sedition law. 

By affirming the need for tangible harm before invoking stringent criminal charges against journalists, the Supreme Court has reaffirmed critical safeguards for press freedom in India, particularly as Section 152 remains under judicial scrutiny.

Also Read: Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi to Visit India for High-Level Talks with NSA Doval

Published by Spandan Dubey
Published: August 13, 2025 19:19:33 IST

Recent Posts

Nick Reiner Appears In Court After Being Charged With Parents’ Rob And Michele’s Murders; Los Angeles Court Reschedules Arraignment For January 7

Nick Reiner: Nick Reiner, the younger son of filmmaker Rob Reiner, made his first court…

December 18, 2025

Lionel Messi GOAT India Tour: Anant Ambani Gifts Football Icon ‘Richard Mille RM 003-V2’ Watch; Know All About This Ultra-Rare Timepiece

Richard Mille RM 003-V2 Tourbillon: During the great football icon Lionel Messi’s recent visit to…

December 18, 2025

‘Dan Did A Great Job’: Donald Trump Appears To Confirm Dan Bongino’s Exit From FBI

Dan Bongino: FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino is preparing to leave the bureau after a…

December 18, 2025