Categories: India

Supreme Court Hails “Rare Settlement” as Wife Walks Away With No Alimony Claims, Returns In-Laws’ Gifts

In a remarkable and unusual conclusion to a long-running matrimonial dispute, the Supreme Court has praised a “rare settlement” in which the wife agreed to part ways without seeking alimony. A Bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and KV Viswanathan noted that both parties have consented to the settlement terms, calling it “one of the rare” cases in which the wife sought no financial claims from her husband.

Add NewsX As A Trusted Source
Add as a preferred
source on Google
Published by Manisha Chauhan
Published: December 12, 2025 19:41:29 IST

In a remarkable and unusual conclusion to a long-running matrimonial dispute, the Supreme Court has praised a “rare settlement” in which the wife agreed to part ways without seeking alimony or maintenance and even returned all gifts received from her in-laws. 

A Bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and KV Viswanathan noted that both parties have consented to the settlement terms, calling it “one of the rare” cases in which the wife sought no financial claims from her husband. 

How Did SC Mediation Lead to This Rare Settlement?

When the couple initially approached the Court, the Bench directed them to consider mediation at the Supreme Court Mediation Centre. In due course, the Court was informed that the mediation had succeeded, and as part of the amicable agreement, the wife had returned the gold bangles she received during the marriage, which had originally belonged to her mother-in-law. 

Supreme Court Praises Wife’s Unusual Gesture 

The Bench noted in its order that this case represented a rare instance in which the wife sought nothing from her husband as part of the settlement. 

The Bench said, “This is one of the rare settlements we have come across over a period of time wherein nothing has been demanded by the wife from the husband.”  

They acknowledge the woman’s decision by saying, “We appreciate this kind gesture which is very rare to be seen nowadays,” the Court said, while exercising its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution to dissolve the marriage.”

Published by Manisha Chauhan
Published: December 12, 2025 19:41:29 IST

Recent Posts

Amid Controversies, Neelam Giri Welcomes Tanya Mittal With Open Arms, Saying, ‘Let Go Kar Dena Chahiye’

Bigg Boss 19 heats up as Neelam Giri takes a surprisingly positive stand toward rumored…

December 12, 2025

42-Year-Old Indian-Origin Millionaire Arrested in California, Tries To Burn a Winery Before Crashing His Tesla

A 42-year-old Indian-origin entrepreneur, Vikram Beri, was arrested in Santa Clara County after allegedly trying…

December 12, 2025

Epstein Files Row: Donald Trump Gets Featured Four Times In Nearly 100,000 Newly Released Photos, Bill Clinton And Bill Gates Also Seen In Social Settings

House Democrats released nearly 100,000 photos from Jeffrey Epstein’s estate, featuring Donald Trump, Bill Clinton,…

December 12, 2025