Categories: India

Supreme Court Takes Suo Moto Cognisance Over Summons To Advocates By Probing Agencies

The apex court has taken suo motu cognisance to observe the issue of probing agencies and police summoning lawyers who provide legal advice or represent their clients in criminal cases. The latest development came after the Enforcement Directorate (ED) issued summons to Senior Advocates Arvind Datar and Pratap Venugopal.

Add NewsX As A Trusted Source
Add as a preferred
source on Google
Published by Suresh Pandey
Last updated: July 9, 2025 19:38:20 IST

The Supreme Court has taken suo motu cognisance to observe the issue of probing agencies and police summoning lawyers who render legal advice or represent the accused in criminal cases. The move taken by the apex court could significantly strengthen legal privilege protections.

The latest development came to the apex court’s radar after the Enforcement Directorate (ED) issued summons to Senior Advocates Arvind Datar and Pratap Venugopal.

The summons was issued in the course of the ED’s investigation into the grant of over 22.7 million Employee Stock Option Plans (ESOPs), valued at more than ₹250 crore, by Care Health Insurance to former Religare Enterprises chairperson Rashmi Saluja, Bar and Bench reported. The ED later withdrew the summons following widespread criticism from bar associations across the nation.

The Supreme Court Took Suo Motu Case Over The ED’s Summon To Senior Advocates

A case has been registered as “In re: Summoning advocates who give legal opinion or represent parties during investigation of cases and related issues.” A bench headed by Chief Justice Bhushan R Gavai and Justices K Vinod Chandran and NV Anjaria will hear the matter on July 14.

The development came following observations by another Supreme Court bench last month that summoning lawyers for advising clients could “shatter the core of legal independence” and constituted “serious interference with the administration of justice.”

The court observed during the June 25 hearing, “This is not just about one lawyer. It is about protecting the spine of the legal system.”

As per reports, in response to the backlash, the ED also issued a circular directing all field offices not to issue summons to advocates in violation of Section 132.

“Lawyers must be able to advise and represent clients without fear of being summoned or harassed,” the court observed.

ALSO READ: DK Shivakumar Occupies CM suite In Karnataka Bhawan, Siddaramaiah Chose To Stay In Annexe CM Suite

Published by Suresh Pandey
Last updated: July 9, 2025 19:38:20 IST

Recent Posts

Google Workspace AI Studio: How To Build Your Own Assistant Without Coding, Learn In Easy Steps

Google has launched its new feature in Google Workspace through which users can create custom…

December 5, 2025

Putin Commits To Peak Performance At Kudankulam Nuclear Facility, Says ‘Russia Will Be A Reliable Supplier’

Vladimir Putin during his visit to India, announced that the capacity of the Kudankulam Nuclear…

December 5, 2025

Top Opposition Leaders Including Rahul Gandhi, Kharge Not Invited To Presidential Banquet For Putin, But You Might See THIS Congress MP In Attendance

The Congress alleged that Mallikarjun Kharge and Rahul Gandhi were not invited to the Presidential…

December 5, 2025