Categories: EntertainmentIndia

Interim Relief For Elvish Yadav In Snake Venom Case, Supreme Court Stays Trial

The Supreme Court on Wednesday granted an interim stay on legal proceedings against YouTuber Elvish Yadav in connection with a rave where snake venom and other illegal drugs were allegedly supplied and consumed.

Add NewsX As A Trusted Source
Add as a preferred
source on Google
Published by Suresh Pandey
Published: August 7, 2025 02:19:02 IST

The Supreme Court on Wednesday granted an interim stay on legal proceedings against YouTuber Elvish Yadav in connection with a rave where snake venom and other illegal drugs were allegedly supplied and consumed.

A bench of Justices M M Sundresh and Joymalya Bagchi issued notice to the respondents, including the Uttar Pradesh government and complainant Gaurav Gupta, seeking their response to Yadav’s plea.

Elvish Yadav Approached Supreme Court Against Allahabad High Court’s Order

Yadav had approached the Supreme Court seeking the quashing of the chargesheet filed against him and the summons issued in the case.

Earlier in May, the Allahabad High Court had dismissed his plea, observing that the allegations warranted a thorough legal examination as multiple FIRs had been registered in the matter. Today, the counsel appearing for Yadav informed the top court that his client has challenged the Allahabad High Court’s order denying him relief.

The top court ordered an interim stay on legal proceedings against Yadav and issued a notice to the respondents in the matter.

YouTuber Elvish Yadav has been charge-sheeted under Sections 9, 39, 48A, 49, 50 and 51 of the Wildlife Protection Act and Sections 284, 289 and 120B of the IPC with Sections 8, 22, 29, 30 and 32 of the NDPS Act.

FIR Was Registered Under Wildlife Protection Act, NDPS Act

The FIR was registered at Police Station Sector-49, Noida, District Gautam Buddh Nagar. A summons order has also been issued by the First Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gautam Buddh Nagar.

Yadav challenged the chargesheet and the proceedings because the informant was not a competent person to lodge an FIR under the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972. It is pleaded that no snake, narcotic or psychotropic substance has been recovered from the applicant.

(With ANI Inputs) 

ALSO READ: Who Is Aarti Sathe? Former BJP Spokesperson Elevated As A Bombay High Court Judge

Published by Suresh Pandey
Published: August 7, 2025 02:19:02 IST

Recent Posts

Putin Commits To Peak Performance At Kudankulam Nuclear Facility, Says ‘Russia Will Be A Reliable Supplier’

Vladimir Putin during his visit to India, announced that the capacity of the Kudankulam Nuclear…

December 5, 2025

Top Opposition Leaders Including Rahul Gandhi, Kharge Not Invited To Presidential Banquet For Putin, But You Might See THIS Congress MP In Attendance

The Congress alleged that Mallikarjun Kharge and Rahul Gandhi were not invited to the Presidential…

December 5, 2025

Redmi Note 15 5G, Note 15 Pro and Note 15 Pro+: Shocking Leaked Price, Expected Specs, Design, Camera, And Everything You Need To Know

Redmi is expected to launch its Note 15 5G series which will have three amazing…

December 5, 2025