Categories: Entertainment News

Nivin Pauly Accuses Producer P. A. Shamnas of Forgery Over Action Hero Biju-2 Title Rights

Producer P. A. Shamnas faces forgery charges for allegedly faking Nivin Pauly’s signature to gain rights to Action Hero Biju 2. The case stems from a financial dispute after Shamnas invested ₹1.9 crore in the film. Nivin Pauly denies wrongdoing, citing ongoing legal arbitration.

Add NewsX As A Trusted Source
Add as a preferred
source on Google
Published by Reha Vohra
Published: July 30, 2025 00:08:16 IST

A serious legal issue has emerged in the Malayalam film industry as producer P. A. Shamnas faces allegations of forgery connected to the upcoming movie Action Hero Biju‑2. The case, registered at the Palarivattom police station in Kerala, accuses Shamnas of forging actor–producer Nivin Pauly’s signature in order to unlawfully obtain rights to the film’s title.

Forgery Allegation: P. A. Shamnas Accused of Faking Signature to Claim Action Hero Biju 2 Title Rights

According to the complaint, Shamnas submitted a document with a falsified signature to the Kerala Film Chamber to register the title under his banner, Indian Movie Makers. The police have booked him under sections related to forgery and the use of forged documents. The case is linked to a broader dispute between Shamnas and the original Action Hero Biju creators, Nivin Pauly and director Abrid Shine.

Shamnas Alleges Betrayal Over Action Hero Biju 2 Investment and Rights

Shamnas had previously partnered with them on the film Mahaveeryar, which did not perform well financially. In an attempt to resolve the loss, Pauly reportedly promised Shamnas a co-production role and compensation for Action Hero Biju‑2. Based on this, Shamnas invested nearly ₹1.9 crore in the project in early 2024 and believed he had secured official rights to the title.

However, the situation became murky when Pauly and Shine reportedly signed an overseas distribution deal without acknowledging Shamnas’s involvement. The producer alleges that they used an earlier agreement to falsely claim sole ownership of the film, leading to significant financial losses.

In a separate complaint, Shamnas had already accused Pauly and Shine of cheating and criminal breach of trust. Nivin Pauly has responded publicly, stating the matter is under legal arbitration and accusing the new FIR of distorting facts. He has expressed confidence that the truth will come out in due course.

Also Read: Who Is Ramya Mohan? Woman Accuses Vijay Sethupathi Of Casting Couch But Deletes Post Later: Getting Too Many Enquiries

Published by Reha Vohra
Published: July 30, 2025 00:08:16 IST

Recent Posts

Chennai Airport Shocker: 34-Year-Old Man Jumps Out Of Moving Air Arabia Flight Moments After Touchdown, Opened Emergency Exit After Vomiting Twice On Board

Chaos erupted at Chennai International Airport after a passenger opened an emergency exit and jumped…

May 3, 2026

Shonarpur Dakshin Clash: Roopa Ganguly vs Lovely Maitra, Can BJP Break TMC’s Stronghold In West Bengal Polls?

Roopa Ganguly faces Arundhuti Maitra in a tight Shonarpur Dakshin contest, with results on May…

May 3, 2026