Categories: India

“Presence Or Absence Of Hymenal Tear Cannot Be Treated As Conclusive Proof Of Sexual Assault”: Delhi High Court

Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma dismissed the appeal filed by the convicted man, upholding charges under Section 18 read with Sections 5(m) and 5(n) of the POCSO Act, 2012, as well as Section 511 read with Section 376AB of the IPC.

Add NewsX As A Trusted Source
Add as a preferred
source on Google
Published by Meera Verma
Last updated: October 28, 2025 17:49:02 IST

Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma dismissed the appeal filed by the convicted man, upholding charges under Section 18 read with Sections 5(m) and 5(n) of the POCSO Act, 2012, as well as Section 511 read with Section 376AB of the IPC.

The Court observed that the combined evidence of the victim’s testimony, parental statements, and forensic reports has conclusively established the accused’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

“The unchallenged concordance of ocular testimony and forensic report materially strengthens the prosecution’s case,” Justice Sharma noted. 

Furthermore, the Court clarified that the act of changing the child’s clothes prior to medical examination does not weaken the prosecution’s evidence under the POCSO Act.

Case Details & Forensic Evidence

The incident occurred while the minor was sleeping in her aunt’s room, where her maternal uncle allegedly attempted to assault her. The child’s mother reportedly saw the accused exiting the room, adjusting his clothing. Subsequent investigation revealed semen stains on the child’s garments, and DNA analysis confirmed a match with the accused.

Rejecting the defence argument that an intact hymen disproved the offence, the court referred to Supreme Court precedents, emphasising that any act towards penetration constitutes an attempt, and the absence of hymenal rupture does not negate the crime.

Intoxication And Intent Not A Defence

The Court also dismissed the accused’s claim of intoxication, highlighting the lack of evidence showing that he was incapable of forming criminal intent. Justice Sharma clarified, “Even if the appellant was under some level of intoxication, such a plea cannot automatically exonerate his criminal liability.”

Upholding the trial court’s findings, the High Court stated that the conclusions regarding credibility, motive, and consistency of the prosecution’s evidence were justified.

ALSO READ: New Shocking Details In UPSC Aspirant Murder Case: Hard Disk Recovered With Obscene Videos Of 15 Women In Delhi Flat

Published by Meera Verma
Last updated: October 28, 2025 17:49:02 IST

Recent Posts

What Is UGC Bill In India? New UGC Rules 2026, Regulations, Benefits and Penalties- Explained

The Supreme Court has put the implementation of the contentious UGC Bill norms on hold,…

January 29, 2026

China Issues Open Threat To Australia Over Darwin Port Takeover, Warns Of ‘Consequences’ As Canberra Moves To Seize Back Strategic Hub

China–Australia relations have hit a new low over the future of the strategically vital Port…

January 29, 2026

WATCH: Viral Video Shows International Boxer Saweety Boora Slapping Man During Roadside Altercation In Almora After Protest Over Throwing A Liquor Bottle

International boxer Saweety Boora was caught on camera slapping a man during a roadside altercation…

January 29, 2026