Categories: IndiaRegionals

Shoe-throwing incident on CJI: Criminal contempt proceedings loom for Advocate Rakesh Kishore

Advocate Rakesh Kishore faces criminal contempt proceedings after allegedly hurling a shoe at CJI Gavai. AG R Venkataramani grants consent, calling his actions scandalous and harmful to judicial integrity.

Add NewsX As A Trusted Source
Add as a preferred
source on Google
Published by Sambhav Sharma
Last updated: October 17, 2025 10:37:05 IST

New Delhi: The Attorney General for India R Venkataramani has granted consent to initiate criminal contempt proceedings against advocate Rakesh Kishore.

Kishore recently made headlines for allegedly throwing a shoe at Chief Justice of India BR Gavai. 

Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) President Vikas Singh urged the bench led by Justice Surya Kant that the matter cannot be allowed to pass without consequence. 

Singh confirmed that the Attorney General for India has granted the mandatory consent under the Contempt of Courts Act, allowing the filing of criminal contempt proceedings by a third party.

Singh said: ‘The incident cannot go unnoticed. The person has shown no remorse after CJI pardoned him. He has gone berserk on social media.’

Supporting the move, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta stated that the matter goes beyond a personal affront and touches upon the institutional integrity of the judiciary. 

SG Mehta: ‘Institutional dignity is at stake.’

Justice Surya Kant acknowledged the seriousness of the issue. 

Justice Kant said: ‘We are all for free speech. The problem is how to regulate it. The Hon’ble CJI has shown great magnanimity, and that shows the institution is not shaken by such incidents.’

The bench is expected to take up the matter after the Diwali break.

AG Venkataramani, has granted his consent under Section 15(1)(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to initiate criminal contempt proceedings against Rakesh Kishore. 

In a communication addressed to the President of SCBA, Vikas Singh, the AG stated that Kishore’s conduct and utterances amount to criminal contempt of the Supreme Court as defined under Section 2(c) of the Act. 

He described the behaviour as ‘scandalous’ and aimed at demeaning the authority of the Court. 

The letter reads: ‘Such behaviour strikes at the very foundation of the justice delivery system and has the clear tendency to lower public confidence in the institution of the judiciary.’

Published by Sambhav Sharma
Last updated: October 17, 2025 10:37:05 IST

Recent Posts

Who Was Grady Demond Wilson? ‘Sanford And Son’ Star, Sitcom Icon Passes Away At 79- A Look At His Legacy

Grady Demond Wilson, famed as Lamont in Sanford and Son, dies at 79, leaving behind…

January 31, 2026

IND vs NZ: Ishan Kishan Explodes With Maiden T20I Century, 103 Off 43 Puts World Cup Rivals on Notice

Ishan Kishan silenced his critics in emphatic fashion, blasting a sensational maiden T20I century with…

January 31, 2026

Union Budget 2026: FM Nirmala Sitharaman Set to Break a 75-Year Tradition Tomorrow- Here’s Why It’s Historic and Different

Sitharaman’s 9th Budget, on a Sunday, may break a 75-year speech tradition with a long-term…

January 31, 2026