Categories: India News

UP Prisoner Release Negligence Case: Govt Transfers ₹ 5L To Prisoner After SC Raps For ‘Prolonged Custody’

The Supreme Court criticized UP jail authorities after a Muslim man's bail release was delayed for nearly a month. The state paid ₹5 lakh interim compensation. The Court demanded accountability and a thorough probe, warning that similar negligence won’t be tolerated. Next hearing: Aug 25.

Add NewsX As A Trusted Source
Add as a preferred
source on Google
Published by Sambhav Sharma
Last updated: June 27, 2025 19:07:35 IST

The Uttar Pradesh government on Friday informed the Supreme Court that it has compensated a man whose release from Ghaziabad jail was delayed by nearly a month despite being granted bail. 

The Supreme Court has scheduled the next hearing for August 25 to over a detailed investigation into the alleged negligence in the release of the Muslim man, who was jailed under Uttar Pradesh’s Anti-Conversion Law.

The bench comprising Justice K.V. Viswanathan and Justice N. Kotiswar Singh recorded the compliance report submitted by the counsel representing the Uttar Pradesh government.

According to the report, the government has transferred ₹5 lakh as interim compensation to the prisoner’s account, in compliance with the Court’s order.

However, the Court expressed displeasure over the conduct of the jail authorities and said that a penalty of ₹5 lakh could be imposed on the officer found responsible. 

In the previous hearing, the Court had strongly remarked that the case was a matter of personal liberty and such negligence would not be tolerated.

The bench had asked the Director General (Prisons) of Uttar Pradesh how such incidents would be prevented in the future.

The DG assured the Court that jail superintendents would be given instructions.

The Court directed that the scope of the investigation must determine whether the delay in the prisoner’s release was intentional, who was responsible, and why the prisoner was kept in custody after May 27, 2025.

Justice Viswanathan firmly stated that the Court would not let the matter go, as many others could be languishing in jail under similar circumstances.

The issue came to light when the prisoner filed a petition, stating that he was not released despite being granted bail in April because the bail order did not mention a specific subsection of the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act. 

The Court called this a mockery of justice and affirmed that the bail order was valid. 

The bench stressed the need to sensitise officials.

ALSO READ: Struggling Parents Live-Streamed Sexual Acts To Fund Daughters’ Education, Arrested In Hyderabad

Published by Sambhav Sharma
Last updated: June 27, 2025 19:07:35 IST

Recent Posts

Assam Emerging As Major Contributor To Stronger India-US Ties: Himanta Sarma

Himanta Biswa Sarma met US Ambassador to India Sergio Gor and said Assam can play…

May 13, 2026

Trump Suggests Possible Relief On Russian Oil Curbs, Says Iran War End Could Lower Prices

Donald Trump suggested that Washington could consider more measures to tackle rising crude oil prices.

May 13, 2026

India And Russia Set To Discuss Progress On Key Agreements At Jaishankar-Lavrov Meeting

Russia’s Foreign Ministry said, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar will…

May 13, 2026