Categories: World

Wisconsin Supreme Court Greenlights Ban on Conversion Therapy

The Wisconsin Supreme Court has ruled that a legislative committee illegally blocked the state’s conversion therapy ban, handing Gov. Evers more control over agency rules. The decision also affects laws on environmental and health protections, while igniting a power struggle with GOP lawmakers.

Add NewsX As A Trusted Source
Add as a preferred
source on Google
Published by Kriti Dhingra
Published: July 8, 2025 21:52:48 IST

The Wisconsin Supreme Court on Tuesday cleared the path for a statewide ban on conversion therapy, ruling that a legislative committee overstepped its authority in blocking the measure, The Associated Press reported. 

The landmark 4-3 decision marks a significant shift in the power balance between the governor and the state’s Republican-controlled Legislature, the report said.

What the Court Ruling Means

According to the report, the court found that the Joint Committee for the Review of Administrative Rules, a GOP-led body, acted unconstitutionally by blocking rules issued by state agencies, including the ban on conversion therapy.

The ruling provides Governor Tony Evers, a Democrat, with greater ability to implement agency rules with the power of law.

Stressing that Tuesday’s ruling was “very significant,” Evers said it will prevent a handful of legislators from holding rules hostage without explanation or action and bringing gridlock throughout state government,” as reported by the AP.

What Is Conversion Therapy?

Conversion therapy is the process of trying to change a person’s sexual orientation or gender identity. According to the AP report, conversion therapy is prohibited in 23 US states and DC and more than a dozen local governments in Wisconsin have already enacted bans.

The state therapist licensing board had defined the practice as unprofessional conduct in April 2024, but it was twice blocked by the legislative committee, the report further said. 

Although the case involved conversion therapy, it touches on regulations linked to environmental protections, public health, and vaccine mandates.

Environmental groups, such as Midwest Environmental Advocates’ Wilkin Gibart, welcomed the ruling, terming it a step to put into place legislation already enacted by the Legislature. 

Sharp Conservative Dissent 

Meanwhile, Conservative Justice Brian Hagedorn termed the ruling “lacking in legal analysis” even as Justice Rebecca Bradley warned that it confers “unchecked” lawmaking authority to the executive branch, according to AP.

Despite resistance, the liberal majority stated that the Legislature had trespassed against the constitution by trying a “legislative veto” that only the governor can.

ALSO READ: 10 Arrested Over ‘Planned Ambush’ on Texas Immigration Detention Center, Officer Wounded

Published by Kriti Dhingra
Published: July 8, 2025 21:52:48 IST

Recent Posts

UP BJP President Pankaj Chaudhary Defends SIR Amid Opposition Criticism: ‘We Do Not Run Away From…’

Reacting to the row over the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls, UP BJP president…

December 21, 2025

Epstein Case Controversy: What Is The Viral File 468? Why Was Trump, Melania And Maxwell Photo Removed From Justice Department Website, Explained

DOJ removes File 468 from Epstein documents, which included a photo of Trump, Melania, and…

December 21, 2025

Caught On CCTV: Amid Payal Gaming MMS Chaos, Leaked Video Of Young Couple’s Sexual Act On Ghaziabad-Meerut Train Goes Viral, Investigation Awaits

A viral CCTV video showing a young couple engaging in sexual activity inside an RRTS…

December 21, 2025