
Delhi High Court Slams Baba Ramdev’s Patanjali 'Dhoka' Ad.
The Delhi High Court has barred Baba Ramdev’s Patanjali Ayurved Limited and Patanjali Foods Limited from airing, publishing, or circulating their recent advertisement that labelled other Chyawanprash brands as “Dhoka” (deception).
The court’s order followed a petition filed by Dabur India Limited, which claimed that the ad unfairly targeted its flagship Dabur India Limited, which claimed that the ad unfairly targeted its flagship Dabur Chyawanprash and disparaged the entire category of Ayurvedic health products.
Justice Tejas Karia, while issuing summons in Dabur India Limited v. Patanjali Ayurved Limited & Anr., held that the advertisement prima facie amounted to generic disparagement of all competing Chyawanprash brands, including Dabur, which holds over 61 per cent market share in the segment.
The Court observed that calling all other Chyawanprash “Dhoka” was derogatory and misleading and went beyond permissible puffery or comparative advertising.
“Calling all other Chyawanprash as ‘Dhoka’ or deception amounts to commercial disparagement,” the court stated, emphasising that while exaggeration and creative liberty are allowed, advertisers “cannot denigrate the products of others as a class in their entirety.”
Dabur, represented by Senior Advocate Sandeep Sethi, argued that Patanjali’s commercial featuring Baba Ramdev suggested that all other Chyawanprash brands were fraudulent, duping consumers and lacking Ayurvedic authenticity. The ad, released on television and social media, allegedly urged viewers to “protect themselves from daily deceptions sold in the name of Chyawanprash” and to consume only Patanjali Special Chyawanprash.
Patanjali, represented by Senior Advocate Rajiv Nayar, defended the campaign, stating it was merely “puffery and hyperbole”, permissible under the law.
The counsel contended that the word ‘Dhoka’ was not directed at Dabur specifically and that the ad simply highlighted the superiority of Patanjali’s product.
Rejecting this argument, the Court said that even generic disparagement of an entire product category harms the market leader and constitutes unfair competition. “From the perspective of the consumer, the message conveyed is that all other Chyawanprash, including Dabur’s, are deceptive,” Justice Karia held.
Finding a prima facie case in Dabur’s favour, the Court issued an interim injunction restraining Patanjali and its affiliates from airing or publishing the impugned advertisement in any form, on television, print, digital, or social media, and directed the company to take down the ad from YouTube, Instagram, and other platforms within 72 hours.
The main matter will next be heard on February 26, 2026.
(Inputs from ANI)
Manisha Chauhan is a passionate journalist with 3 years of experience in the media industry, covering everything from trending entertainment buzz and celebrity spotlights to thought-provoking book reviews and practical health tips. Known for blending fresh perspectives with reader-friendly writing, she creates content that informs, entertains, and inspires. When she’s not chasing the next viral story, you’ll find her diving into a good book or exploring new wellness trends.
Su-57 Vs F-35 Fighter Jet: India is weighing a crucial defence decision as it evaluates…
Russian President Vladimir Putin reached New Delhi, received a ceremonial welcome, visited Rajghat, and is…
Cold Moon December 2025: How And In Which Indian Cities Can We Watch The Full Moon
Cold Moon 2025: The last full moon of 2025 (aka Cold Moon) is set to…