Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni
YouTuber Lauren Neidigh, recognized online as LethalLauren904, is pursuing legal measures against actress Blake Lively, asserting that she has faced harassment and intimidation related to a prominent court case.
In recently submitted court papers, Neidigh claims that Lively’s legal team targeted her and multiple other online creators following their posts expressing criticism of the actress. She asserts that they received aggressive subpoenas requesting sensitive personal information—such as banking records—which she believes was a calculated effort to intimidate and silence her.
A post shared by Miss Understood Podcast (@missunderstoodwithrachel)
Even though Lively’s attorneys subsequently retracted the subpoenas, Neidigh contends that the harm had already occurred. In her motion, she observes that the legal risk remains, as the subpoenas may be reintroduced at any moment. She is currently requesting the court for a protective order to prevent what she describes as “abusive discovery tactics” and is also pursuing sanctions against Lively’s legal team.
Neidigh characterizes the experience as intrusive and psychologically exhausting. She asserts that Lively’s lawyers disregarded her concerns and did not explain their requests. Her situation is now gaining attention online, raising wider worries among content creators and journalists about the chilling impact celebrity lawsuits might have on free expression.
This recent advancement introduces another complexity to a legal story that has been progressing since late 2024. In December of that year, Lively sued her It Ends With Us co-star and director, Justin Baldoni, alleging sexual harassment and retaliation. Baldoni retaliated with a substantial $400 million countersuit, claiming defamation and extortion. That lawsuit was thrown out in June.
Conflict between the two celebrities reignited at a recent deposition in New York, marking their first direct encounter since the legal battle started. The meeting was extremely secure and reportedly stressful, with both parties disputing confidentiality and media leaks. Currently, every legal team is advocating for stricter controls on the management of sensitive materials in the future, referencing continual threats and public oversight.
Neidigh’s motion, while not directly linked to the main accusations, underscores a rising worry: that digital creators are becoming entangled in legal disputes they did not anticipate merely for making comments on those matters.
With the trial scheduled for March 9, 2026, this case is more than just a courtroom clash between two famous individuals. It’s also developing into a significant examination of where the boundary lies between legitimate commentary and legal intimidation in the digital era.
Reha Vohra is an entertainment and lifestyle journalist passionate about telling stories that celebrate culture, trends, and everyday life. She love diving into celebrity news, fashion, viral moments, and unique human experiences that resonate with readers. The goal is to create content that’s engaging, inspiring, and relatable, bringing fresh perspectives with a blend of curiosity and creativity.
What Does The Heliconia Plant Symbolise At PM Modi’s Meeting With Russian President Putin?
PM Modi and Putin spoke about major issues, shared a warm handshake, and posed for…
Why Elon Musk’s X Has Been Slapped With $140 Million Fine in Europe? All You Need To Know
The European Union has fined the Elon Musk's social media company X with $140 million…
Vladimir Putin sat beside PM Modi as President Droupadi Murmu hosted a state banquet at…
