Categories: Entertainment

‘You Can’t Stop That’: Zakir Khan Hits Back At Javed Akhtar Criticising Vulgar Language In Comedy

A debate erupts as Zakir Khan responds to Javed Akhtar’s criticism of vulgar language in stand-up comedy. Khan argues comedy mirrors middle-class life, reflecting raw, authentic experiences, while Akhtar emphasizes refined artistry. The clash highlights evolving norms in Indian humor.

Add NewsX As A Trusted Source
Add as a preferred
source on Google
Published by Bhumi Vashisht
Published: December 21, 2025 13:24:36 IST

A battle of ideas has occurred in the Indian entertainment scene between the iconic poet Javed Akhtar and the “Sakht Launda” of humor, Zakir Khan. The whole issue started when Akhtar went after the modern-day stand-up comedians, saying their art had gone down the drain, and they were merely using “vulgarity” and “cuss words” to draw laughter.

He painted the whole scenario in a bad light and suggested a decline in the artistry of humor. While Akhtar favors a more refined, literary approach personally, Khan, the digital era’s biggest storyteller, has taken upon himself to defend the truthfulness of the art, thus, creating a huge debate on the freedom of expression against that of traditional politeness.

Zakir’s Authenticity

The main point of Zakir Khan’s reply is that comedy is not only a refined performance on stage but rather a reflection of the streets. He maintains that to use foul language in a stand-up is not for the sake of being offensive on the contrary, it is about depicting the middle-class experience in its raw and unfiltered form. 

For Zakir, the use of a swear word in a tale of little-town friendships does not denote a deficiency of vocabulary; it is a linguistic sign of closeness and truth. Whereas Akhtar perceives the stage to be a temple of high art, Khan perceives it to be a mirror to the chaotic, often profane but, nonetheless, very honest exchanges of the common man.

Artistic Evolution

The discussion underscores a change in the definition of “decency” in the performing arts from one generation to another. Zakir opines that humor has a cyclic nature with the audience and current public prefers relatability to rigid linguistic structures.

Though he highly regards Akhtar’s contribution, Khan proposes that imposition of traditional censorship on contemporary mediums kills the “Sakht” spirit which is characteristic of Indian comedy today.

Choosing to remain connected to his cultural roots, Zakir claims that a joke’s potency is in its truth, no matter if the language is up to the standard of a classical poet or not.

Also Read: Gaurav Khanna Defends Father’s ‘Would Have Slapped Farrhana’ Over TV Remark, Says ‘Parents Behave Like This’ Amid Backlash Online Row

Published by Bhumi Vashisht
Published: December 21, 2025 13:24:36 IST

Recent Posts

Maharashtra Shocker: Woman Knocks On The Wrong Hotel Room Door, Ends Up Getting Gangraped By Three Men, All Accused Arrested

A 30-year-old woman was allegedly gang-raped by three men in a hotel in Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar…

December 21, 2025

WATCH: Karnataka Teacher Assaults Differently-Abled Child With Belt, Plastic Pipe As Wife Pours Chilli Powder; Horrific Video Shocks Internet

A Karnataka schoolteacher and his wife were arrested for brutally torturing a 10-year-old differently abled…

December 21, 2025

What Was The Cost Of Lionel Messi’s GOAT India Tour? Arrested Kolkata Organiser Satadru Dutta Reveals Details

Arrested Kolkata organiser Satadru Dutta told investigators that Lionel Messi’s GOAT India Tour cost ₹100…

December 21, 2025