Explore
Settings

Settings

×

Reading Mode

Adjust the reading mode to suit your reading needs.

Font Size

Fix the font size to suit your reading preferences

Language

Select the language of your choice. NewsX reports are available in 11 global languages.
  • Home»
  • India»
  • Attempt To Grope Victim’s Breasts Is ‘Aggravated Sexual Assault’, Not ‘Attempt To Rape’: Calcutta High Court

Attempt To Grope Victim’s Breasts Is ‘Aggravated Sexual Assault’, Not ‘Attempt To Rape’: Calcutta High Court

Calcutta High Court ruled that an attempt to grope breasts amounts to aggravated sexual assault under POCSO, not attempted rape, suspending earlier conviction.

Attempt To Grope Victim’s Breasts Is ‘Aggravated Sexual Assault’, Not ‘Attempt To Rape’: Calcutta High Court


The Calcutta High Court on Friday suspended the conviction and sentencing of an accused under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The court observed that an attempt to grope a victim’s breasts can only amount to “aggravated sexual assault,” not “attempt to rape” under the Act.

Earlier, a West Bengal trial court had found the accused guilty of both aggravated sexual assault and attempt to rape. The court had sentenced him to 12 years of rigorous imprisonment.

However, while hearing the appeal, a division bench of Justice Arijit Banerjee and Justice Biswaroop Chowdhury pointed out that the medical report of the victim did not show any penetration or attempt of penetration. According to the victim’s statement, the accused, who was under the influence of alcohol, tried to grope her breasts.

The High Court stressed that this evidence could support a charge under Section 10 of the POCSO Act for aggravated sexual assault, but not for attempted rape.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

“If after final hearing the charge is reduced only to aggravated sexual assault, the sentence would drop to between five and seven years instead of 12 years,” the bench noted. Currently, the accused has already spent 28 months in prison.

The court suspended the operation of the conviction and sentence until the appeal is completely heard or until further orders. It also stayed the payment of the fine until the appeal’s outcome.

At the same time, the division bench made it clear that their observations should not affect the final decision of the appeal hearing.

This case has raised important discussions on how courts differentiate between sexual assault and attempted rape under the POCSO Act, and the importance of evidence in framing appropriate charges.

ALSO READ: President Murmu Leads Indian Delegation At The Vatican To Pay Homage To Pope Francis


Advertisement · Scroll to continue
Advertisement · Scroll to continue