Explore
Settings

Settings

×

Reading Mode

Adjust the reading mode to suit your reading needs.

Font Size

Fix the font size to suit your reading preferences

Language

Select the language of your choice. NewsX reports are available in 11 global languages.
we-woman
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
  • HOME»
  • India»
  • Delhi Court Turns Down Plea For FIR Against MF Husain’s Paintings, Cites No Need For Further Probe

Delhi Court Turns Down Plea For FIR Against MF Husain’s Paintings, Cites No Need For Further Probe

The Patiala House Court has dismissed a plea seeking the registration of an FIR against the Delhi Art Gallery (DAG) and its officials regarding two paintings by the late artist MF Husain.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue
Delhi Court Turns Down Plea For FIR Against MF Husain’s Paintings, Cites No Need For Further Probe

MF Husain


The Patiala House Court has dismissed a plea seeking the registration of an FIR against the Delhi Art Gallery (DAG) and its officials regarding two paintings by the late artist MF Husain.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

The petition alleged that the artworks hurt religious sentiments, but the court ruled no further investigation was required as all relevant evidence was already available.

The case was initiated by advocate Amita Sachdeva, who claimed that the paintings depicted Hindu deities Hanuman and Ganesha holding nude female figures, which she found offensive. During a visit to the DAG in Connaught Place on December 4, 2024, Sachdeva took photographs of the contentious artworks.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

She then filed a formal complaint with the Parliament Street Police Station on December 9, 2024, after researching past legal cases against Husain for similar artwork.

Court’s Rationale

Judicial Magistrate (First Class) Sahil Monga reviewed the Action Taken Report (ATR) submitted by the police. The report included CCTV footage, a gallery inventory, and other evidence. The court observed that the paintings in question were listed in the gallery’s records under Serial Nos. 6 and 10.

The judge noted that all the evidence, including CCTV footage and the gallery’s records, was already in the complainant’s possession or on record. He stated:

“All the facts and circumstances of the case are within the knowledge of the complainant. CCTV footage of Delhi Art Gallery, NVR, and the paintings in question have already been seized. In the considered opinion of this court, no further investigation or evidence collection is required at this stage.”

The court further clarified that any additional investigation, if required, could be undertaken later under Section 225 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). Consequently, the petition under Section 175(3) of the CrPC was dismissed.

Seizure of Paintings Ordered

Although the plea for an FIR was rejected, the court instructed the investigating officer to seize the disputed paintings and file a report on the seizure by January 22, 2025.

Timeline of Events

December 4, 2024: Advocate Amita Sachdeva visited the DAG and photographed the paintings.

December 9, 2024: A formal complaint was lodged with the Parliament Street Police Station.

December 10, 2024: During a follow-up visit, the paintings were removed, and gallery officials denied their display.

January 22, 2025: The investigating officer is required to submit a report on the seized paintings.

Conclusion

The court’s decision underscores that the investigation has adequately addressed the complainant’s concerns. It also highlights that any further legal steps would depend on future developments, if necessary.

Read More: PM Modi Pays Tribute To Netaji Bose, Calls for Unity And Vigilance To Build A Developed India

Filed under

MF Husain

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

mail logo

Subscribe to receive the day's headlines from NewsX straight in your inbox