The European Union imposed a €120 million ($140 million) fine on Elon Musk’s social media platform X after completing a two-year investigation under the Digital Services Act (DSA). The probe examined X’s transparency systems and found multiple violations. Musk reacted on X and used strong language to criticise the decision.
The EU stated that the action followed a detailed review of platform practices and stressed that all major online services must follow safety and transparency requirements. The DSA allows heavy penalties for large platforms that fail to manage risks related to illegal content, scams, and misinformation.
The EU has just decided to give X a €120 MILLION fine under the Digital Services Act.
The EU has also given Hungary a €200 MILLION fine plus €1 million every day for refusing to open their borders.
— PeterSweden (@PeterSweden7) December 5, 2025
Musk Calls EU Fine “Personal Target”
Elon Musk responded within hours of the announcement and rejected the decision on his platform. He wrote that the ruling was “bullshit” and later said the EU targeted him personally.
The “EU” imposed this crazy fine not just on @X, but also on me personally, which is even more insane!
Therefore, it would seem appropriate to apply our response not just to the EU, but also to the individuals who took this action against me. https://t.co/n2LE0eZiI7
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 5, 2025
Musk said he would consider a response against individuals involved in the decision because the penalty also applied to him directly.
His comments followed statements from US officials who criticised the EU’s move. They argued that the fine affected American businesses and free speech. Musk continued to post about the case throughout the day and stated that he planned to challenge the findings.
EU Cites Three Violations: Checkmarks, Ads, and Research Data
The European Commission listed 3 major violations during the investigation:
- It said X used misleading blue checkmarks that failed to confirm the identity of account holders.
2.The Commission also found problems in the platform’s ad transparency system because researchers could not easily identify who bought ads or how they were targeted.
3. In addition, the EU said X blocked researchers from accessing public data that is required to examine systemic risks. These issues resulted in the final €120 million penalty. Regulators gave the platform 60 to 90 days to resolve the problems.
Issue Over Blue Checkmarks Leads to Major Penalty
The EU said X’s blue checkmark system confused users about account authenticity. Before the 2022 ownership change, the platform verified public figures through a review process. After the change, the checkmark became a paid feature through X Premium.
The Commission said the new system allowed accounts to appear verified without confirming identity. It said this increased the chance of fraud and misinformation.
The EU assigned a significant part of the fine to this issue and stated that large platforms must clearly show if account information can be trusted.
EU Flags Problems With X’s Ad Transparency Tools
The Digital Services Act requires platforms to maintain detailed ad repositories that researchers and officials can access. The EU investigation found multiple gaps in X’s system.
It said the repository did not show who purchased ads, how they targeted users, or how much they spent.
The Commission reported delays, technical barriers, and missing information. Regulators said these issues limited the ability to detect illegal ads or influence operations. As a result, they added a separate fine for ad transparency failures and asked X to update the tools within the set deadline.
The European Commission also raised concerns about restrictions on researchers who needed access to public data. Under the DSA, major platforms must allow researchers to study issues such as hate speech, disinformation, and risks during elections. The EU said X created unnecessary obstacles that prevented this access.
Regulators added that reduced visibility into platform activity affected their ability to check compliance. This issue became another major part of the penalty. The EU said large online platforms must support consistent monitoring to protect users and democratic processes.
US Officials Strongly Criticise EU’s Move Against X
The penalty triggered immediate political reactions in the United States. Several US leaders called the fine an attack on American technology companies.
They said the EU used strong regulations to pressure platforms and restrict speech. Statements from senior officials, including senators, criticised the action and urged the US to respond.
They argued that the DSA encourages censorship and affects open discussion. The EU rejected these claims and said the decision followed legal steps. The Commission stated that the fine was the result of a structured investigation and not a political move.
X Faces First Major Enforcement Case Under the DSA
This is the first major enforcement case under the Digital Services Act, which fully came into effect in 2024. The law applies to very large online platforms with global reach.
The EU said the case sets an example for future compliance checks across the industry. It added that X must correct the violations to avoid harsher action.
The Commission said platforms must take responsibility for risks created by their systems. X stated that it would review the findings and continue discussions with regulators. The platform has deadlines of up to 90 days for full compliance.
Swastika Sruti is a Senior Sub Editor at NewsX Digital with 5 years of experience shaping stories that matter. She loves tracking politics- national and global trends, and never misses a chance to dig deeper into policies and developments. Passionate about what’s happening around us, she brings sharp insight and clarity to every piece she works on. When not curating news, she’s busy exploring what’s next in the world of public interest. You can reach her at [swastika.newsx@gmail.com]
